Skip to main content
Parity Update :




Euroland: Bad News from the Past, but Don't Question the Stability Pact



Vincenzo Guzzo and Annamaria Grimaldi (London)

Morgan Stanley


the article





from Public Accounts in the Fray Again



This is the fourth time that we have had to revise upwards our budget deficit forecasts for the euro area in the last two weeks. First, the French government asked for an independent audit of its public finances, the final verdict of which was to raise the 2002 official deficit target by more than half a percentage point, to 2.3-2.6% of GDP. Then, on June 25, the National Statistics revised up Italy's 2001 deficit by two tenths to a reading of 1.6%, on the back of higher-than-expected health expenditure, as more information was gathered from local administrations. One day later, Portugal was in the spotlight with the news that a preliminary report from the ECB would put its 2001 budget deficit to 3.9%. Then, on July 3, it was Italy again in the fray with the official announcement by Eurostat that a large fraction of the receipts arising from the securitization of its state assets will be excluded from the 2001 budget balance, probably pushing it close to -2.2%. But let us have a closer look at these cases.





and this interesting note ...forexnews


7/10/2002 11:53:00 AM France's new center-right government passed a new budget with provisions including an income tax cut at the risk of violating the 3% limit set by the EU Stability Pact. As it stands, the new budget will create a deficit of 46 billion euros or 3.2% of GDP, but the government hopes to close the gap with surpluses in local authority and other finances. While the French government claims that the new budget will stay within the limit, it can balance the budget by 2004 only if the country achieves growth levels of at least 3% in the next two years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WOW! I think that sums it up

Many of you have been reading this blog may have noticed that my blogging frequency has increased over the past few weeks as I got short the market. As you can imagine I am down money since getting short the market, this is the time when most people pull away from posting. But my goal is to stay active and involved and show you that trading is not always rainbows and butterflies. It is times like these that the things I have been sharing over the past couple of weeks are so important. You need to trade small relative to your account. I have a decent short position in the market and my portfolios are set up to make some awesome returns if we finally turn lower. But something I would like to point out is that my account is 70% Cash.  I learned a long time ago how important it is to live by the rules you preach. Because of my discipline I am able to continue to hold my positions, I have time and capital on my side. I can't stress enough how important it is not to get to big....

Stay Small, Stay Out of Trouble

To expand on my post from yesterday about patience. I want to talk about a very important element that allows patience in a position, and that is staying small. If you trade too big RELATIVE to your personal account size, you are likely to be forced to exit the trade before the trade works in your favor. Many trades myself included have all experienced the pains of trading a position way too large given our account size. There is this predisposition out there that the only way you are going to make money in the financial markets is if you are trading 10 lots of options and 1000 shares of stock at the time. This is not the case, and if this is your mentality you will likely ensure yourself trouble. We have all read the stories of traders blowing up their account. I personally think a good rule of thumb is to not risk more than 5% of your account value on any one position. Good Luck Trading! In The Money Trades And 1 favor that we ask:  If you like the hard work w...
more good news from FXStreet : Tom Fitzpatrick, senior technical analyst at Citibank in New York. Monday, July 15, 2002 "Parity is a psychological, not a technical level...and whether we pause around parity or not, we are likely to see significant further dollar losses...Our initial target is $1.03 to $1.0450. If that level is taken out, it actually casts a question mark against the whole of the dollar's rally of the last seven years, and could open up a full-blown bear market for the dollar." Julian Jessop, chief European economist at Standard Chartered Bank. Monday, July 15, 2002 "The dollar is under pressure from everything from economic problems to asset reallocation away from the U.S. and corporate accounting problems. It's difficult to see any positive factor for the dollar at the moment. The root of the problem is the U.S. current account deficit. If the U.S. doesn't have to attract an enormous amount of foreign capital, people wouldn't have to wor...