Skip to main content

USO/IWO trade





I liked the IWO trade idea at first so I decided to analyze it further. I think the time frame used and patterns seen of chart drawing can be subjective. I'm using a lower support line than him. He never mentioned IV in his analysis and after I saw the current disparity I decided to do this trade but at a lower strike and using an exit point based on my TA. Below is my trade worksheet.

Trade Worksheet

Date:               5/18/10                       
Underlying:     USO
Trade Idea:     Sell June 32/30 put spread

Buy/Sell
Qty
Ticker
Month
Strike
Call/Put
Price
Under. Price
Sell
5
USO
June
32/30
Put Spread
.50
$33.50

Pre-Trade Analysis: 
This is more of a gut feel than anything as I feel selling in oil is a bit overdone. If oil finds a bottom near these levels in the next five weeks this play will yield its maximum return. IV is at a relative historical high so I favor selling the put spread rather than buying calls or a call spread. I’m attempting to profit from theta decay, reversion to the mean on IV, and a technical bounce on the underlying. On a technical basis I’m conflicted, depending on which time frame you look at there are different technicals present. I’m using a close below $31.50 as my stop loss as that would be another 6% drop from here and a breach of another long-term resistance from July 09’. This could confirm that my gut instinct is wrong and two recent support levels on the chart didn't hold. We just closed below recent support at $34.00 from October 09’ and Feb 10’. These price points are slightly different depending on if you’re using intraday or closing prices.


                       



































What are known risks? Oil is in at least a short-term downtrend, general weakness in all commodity classes other than metals, recent general pessimism about strength of global recovery because of Europe.


Entry Point: Sell June 32/30 put spread for .50 with USO @ $33.50
                                   
Exit Point: Exit spread if USO closes below $31.50. This should be a rough loss of -$165. However, this is only an estimate as you have overnight and/or gap risk that you can’t get out at your desired exit point. Also, BxA spreads might be wider than normal if volatility is spiking. For these reasons I assume full risk on the trade of $750.

Risk: $750      Return: $250              RoR: 33%


      
Post-Trade Analysis:
After initiating this trade I decided to look at another angle. If my threshold for pain on the short put spread is roughly $170, I wanted to see what kind of comparative risk/return there would be had I just used the $170 to buy calls instead. Below is the analytics on this scenario, it assumes that if we have a bounce in the underlying that IV comes down to a more recent range of about 35%. At this new lower IV range and taking off a few days, even at a price of $36 the return is only about $173. And this would still leave you with another three weeks of theta risk. So assuming you are playing for the underlying to stop falling and/or bet a bounce, I would still favor selling puts here as opposed to buying calls. This analysis however should have been done before the trade and not after.
























Update: On 5/25 I closed this trade out for a loss. I might have jumped the gun a little in that my original exit point was on a close under $31.50 and we haven't yet closed below that level. However, intraday we've traded below $31.00 and also a new 52 week low (see chart below). In the 7 days since this trade was initiated the global macro news has only gotten worse. As of today my gut feel was wrong, another technical level was broken, and I wouldn't put this trade on today. So I'm comfortable closing it out today for a $225 loss rather than possibly take the maximum $750 loss three and half weeks from now. 





Profit/Loss: I sold this spread for a .50 debit and closed it out for .95, net loss of (.45 x  5 contracts) = $225 plus commissions.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WOW! I think that sums it up

Many of you have been reading this blog may have noticed that my blogging frequency has increased over the past few weeks as I got short the market. As you can imagine I am down money since getting short the market, this is the time when most people pull away from posting. But my goal is to stay active and involved and show you that trading is not always rainbows and butterflies. It is times like these that the things I have been sharing over the past couple of weeks are so important. You need to trade small relative to your account. I have a decent short position in the market and my portfolios are set up to make some awesome returns if we finally turn lower. But something I would like to point out is that my account is 70% Cash.  I learned a long time ago how important it is to live by the rules you preach. Because of my discipline I am able to continue to hold my positions, I have time and capital on my side. I can't stress enough how important it is not to get to big....

Stay Small, Stay Out of Trouble

To expand on my post from yesterday about patience. I want to talk about a very important element that allows patience in a position, and that is staying small. If you trade too big RELATIVE to your personal account size, you are likely to be forced to exit the trade before the trade works in your favor. Many trades myself included have all experienced the pains of trading a position way too large given our account size. There is this predisposition out there that the only way you are going to make money in the financial markets is if you are trading 10 lots of options and 1000 shares of stock at the time. This is not the case, and if this is your mentality you will likely ensure yourself trouble. We have all read the stories of traders blowing up their account. I personally think a good rule of thumb is to not risk more than 5% of your account value on any one position. Good Luck Trading! In The Money Trades And 1 favor that we ask:  If you like the hard work w...
more good news from FXStreet : Tom Fitzpatrick, senior technical analyst at Citibank in New York. Monday, July 15, 2002 "Parity is a psychological, not a technical level...and whether we pause around parity or not, we are likely to see significant further dollar losses...Our initial target is $1.03 to $1.0450. If that level is taken out, it actually casts a question mark against the whole of the dollar's rally of the last seven years, and could open up a full-blown bear market for the dollar." Julian Jessop, chief European economist at Standard Chartered Bank. Monday, July 15, 2002 "The dollar is under pressure from everything from economic problems to asset reallocation away from the U.S. and corporate accounting problems. It's difficult to see any positive factor for the dollar at the moment. The root of the problem is the U.S. current account deficit. If the U.S. doesn't have to attract an enormous amount of foreign capital, people wouldn't have to wor...