Skip to main content

AKAM naked put sale

This is the one other trade I had on my radar for today. I'm looking at selling either the naked $40 puts, or the 40/39 put spread. Setting the risk at 1% of trading capital near the break point of the trend line near $40 for either scenario leaves me with a $540 net on the naked $40's, or $480-540 on the spread (depending on if I get filled at .10 or .11). The buying power needed is three times as much for the nakeds and obviously leaves you with extreme risk, so I think I just talked myself in to doing the spread. Initially I thought .10 reward for .90 risk and 100 contracts vs. 15 didn't make any sense, but now that I've done the math this makes even more sense, especially if I can get filled at .11. (Update: After my initial write up I took a look at IV. It is relatively low right now to its recent past, so what I did was increased IV by 12 up to its recent past of 55. I'm assuming that a break of that $40 trend line would coincide with a rising IV. Looking at the two alternatives again after increasing IV, the nakeds leave me with a loss of 1.5% of capital at the $40 break and the spread is still at 1% because you have less delta exposure with the spread. So even if I can only get filled at .10 I'm going to go with the spread.)

The light blue lines are copies of the worst down moves the stock has seen in the last six months. It looks like I would need slightly move than steeper drop than any recent history just to touch the uptrend line tomorrow. Earnings are not due until after July OPEX.  I'm going to look for 1-2 more trades to put on because otherwise the $500 I paid for the SPY put spread as directional bet/hedge doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I think I need to shoot for selling at least $2000 of premium on other trades to be giving up $500 on that SPY bet.

















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WOW! I think that sums it up

Many of you have been reading this blog may have noticed that my blogging frequency has increased over the past few weeks as I got short the market. As you can imagine I am down money since getting short the market, this is the time when most people pull away from posting. But my goal is to stay active and involved and show you that trading is not always rainbows and butterflies. It is times like these that the things I have been sharing over the past couple of weeks are so important. You need to trade small relative to your account. I have a decent short position in the market and my portfolios are set up to make some awesome returns if we finally turn lower. But something I would like to point out is that my account is 70% Cash.  I learned a long time ago how important it is to live by the rules you preach. Because of my discipline I am able to continue to hold my positions, I have time and capital on my side. I can't stress enough how important it is not to get to big....

Stay Small, Stay Out of Trouble

To expand on my post from yesterday about patience. I want to talk about a very important element that allows patience in a position, and that is staying small. If you trade too big RELATIVE to your personal account size, you are likely to be forced to exit the trade before the trade works in your favor. Many trades myself included have all experienced the pains of trading a position way too large given our account size. There is this predisposition out there that the only way you are going to make money in the financial markets is if you are trading 10 lots of options and 1000 shares of stock at the time. This is not the case, and if this is your mentality you will likely ensure yourself trouble. We have all read the stories of traders blowing up their account. I personally think a good rule of thumb is to not risk more than 5% of your account value on any one position. Good Luck Trading! In The Money Trades And 1 favor that we ask:  If you like the hard work w...
more good news from FXStreet : Tom Fitzpatrick, senior technical analyst at Citibank in New York. Monday, July 15, 2002 "Parity is a psychological, not a technical level...and whether we pause around parity or not, we are likely to see significant further dollar losses...Our initial target is $1.03 to $1.0450. If that level is taken out, it actually casts a question mark against the whole of the dollar's rally of the last seven years, and could open up a full-blown bear market for the dollar." Julian Jessop, chief European economist at Standard Chartered Bank. Monday, July 15, 2002 "The dollar is under pressure from everything from economic problems to asset reallocation away from the U.S. and corporate accounting problems. It's difficult to see any positive factor for the dollar at the moment. The root of the problem is the U.S. current account deficit. If the U.S. doesn't have to attract an enormous amount of foreign capital, people wouldn't have to wor...