Skip to main content

Psychological vs Financial Capital

I closed out three June trades today, all for a win, but absolutely threw away $27 on one solely for the purpose of psychological capital. I paid .02 to close some naked $560 calls on GOOG when its at $498. I closed a SPY 114/116 call spread for .11 that could have been closed for .05 last week. I also took a small profit in a naked put sale that was a mistake of a trade to begin with. The problem I'm having is I don't have a locked in plan on when or why to close a trade. Intrinsically it makes no sense to pay .02 for something that is worth nothing with 3 days to go, but psychologically it was worth $27 after commissions to close it out so I can concentrate on July trades.

Once I closed that out, and seeing that the other two are profitable as well, I felt the need to just close them all out, call it a month, and start looking for my next trades since the vast majority of the potential profits could be booked. While that's one way to look at it, the other is that if you consistently throw away pennies, they add up over time. It isn't the case that the trades I took off were eating up available buying power, if that were the case it makes more sense. The actual risk posed by leaving these trades on for the remainder of June expiration was very small, yet I found myself wanting no more risk and moving on. Where I'm struggling is that after I've taken trades off the books and thus risk as well, I start to question myself as to why you just threw away money. I think some of this has to do with being an electronic interface. If I had a $100 bill sitting on the table and my choice was to rip it up or come back and pick it up on Friday at 1pm, I wouldn't rip it up, but yet that's essentially what I did today. Another way to look at it is I paid $100 to not have to worry about a damn thing for the next three days. So now the question is, is that really worth it? Does that make sense to continually on an ongoing basis leave money on the table on trades that have lower risk now than when they were put on? If you asked me what to do on a similar trade I would probably say let it expire, why buy something that is worth nothing.

Here is another part of the psychological game, the $100 I left on the table on its own as a dollar amount isn't the issue. I guess its that my total take this month might be something like $1100 so I'm looking at leaving that $100 on the table as roughly 10% of the profits for not being patient. I was trying to squeeze the remaining pennies for record keeping purposes and not looking at risk/reward on each individual trade. Hmm, I have a lot of work to do in this area still. My concern is that I'm making mistakes and not having a solid game plan while playing small. This means that if I had larger positions on the psychological aspect will be an even bigger burden. I had exit strategies for two of these trades and they weren't triggered, yet I deviated from the plan and closed out early. What good is a trade plan if you don't stick to it? especially if there isn't a compelling reason to deviate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WOW! I think that sums it up

Many of you have been reading this blog may have noticed that my blogging frequency has increased over the past few weeks as I got short the market. As you can imagine I am down money since getting short the market, this is the time when most people pull away from posting. But my goal is to stay active and involved and show you that trading is not always rainbows and butterflies. It is times like these that the things I have been sharing over the past couple of weeks are so important. You need to trade small relative to your account. I have a decent short position in the market and my portfolios are set up to make some awesome returns if we finally turn lower. But something I would like to point out is that my account is 70% Cash.  I learned a long time ago how important it is to live by the rules you preach. Because of my discipline I am able to continue to hold my positions, I have time and capital on my side. I can't stress enough how important it is not to get to big....

Stay Small, Stay Out of Trouble

To expand on my post from yesterday about patience. I want to talk about a very important element that allows patience in a position, and that is staying small. If you trade too big RELATIVE to your personal account size, you are likely to be forced to exit the trade before the trade works in your favor. Many trades myself included have all experienced the pains of trading a position way too large given our account size. There is this predisposition out there that the only way you are going to make money in the financial markets is if you are trading 10 lots of options and 1000 shares of stock at the time. This is not the case, and if this is your mentality you will likely ensure yourself trouble. We have all read the stories of traders blowing up their account. I personally think a good rule of thumb is to not risk more than 5% of your account value on any one position. Good Luck Trading! In The Money Trades And 1 favor that we ask:  If you like the hard work w...
more good news from FXStreet : Tom Fitzpatrick, senior technical analyst at Citibank in New York. Monday, July 15, 2002 "Parity is a psychological, not a technical level...and whether we pause around parity or not, we are likely to see significant further dollar losses...Our initial target is $1.03 to $1.0450. If that level is taken out, it actually casts a question mark against the whole of the dollar's rally of the last seven years, and could open up a full-blown bear market for the dollar." Julian Jessop, chief European economist at Standard Chartered Bank. Monday, July 15, 2002 "The dollar is under pressure from everything from economic problems to asset reallocation away from the U.S. and corporate accounting problems. It's difficult to see any positive factor for the dollar at the moment. The root of the problem is the U.S. current account deficit. If the U.S. doesn't have to attract an enormous amount of foreign capital, people wouldn't have to wor...