Skip to main content

When to use Futures instead of Options

If you've taken the path that many retail traders have journeyed you probably started with buying stocks, then options, then futures. If you haven't yet made your way to futures this post is for you. Recently I've been looking through my past trades going back to 2008 before the financial crisis hit and I had just started to trade something other than a covered call. Prior to the end of 2007 and early 2008 I had solely been a covered call writer for about six years. I was looking through past trades to try and get a feel for what I used to trade and how my numbers were so great for so long. In a past post I commented that most of this was luck as I was long and writing calls from 2002-2008. But I found something that contradicts that.

I got bearish in February 2008 and started dabbling in buying puts for the first time. Clearly I didn't know what I was doing and I'll show you why. Below is a screen shot from my trade log.

Though I did great that month as the market was falling, I was actually taking on more risk than needed given my intentions. All I knew what that was I was bearish and wanted to play the market to the downside without shorting SPY or DIA because at the time their prices were so high that a short position took up too much capital. Up until this time all I knew was options, I was still trying to understand futures and wasn't ready to use them with real money until I had a better understanding.

What you can't see in that snap shot is the price of the underlying at the time I initiated the trade. But I can tell you what I was doing. I was buying DIA at about $10 In-the-Money (ITM) and looking to sell when the underlying moved $1, or about 100  Dow points. I knew enough at that time to know better than to buy At-the-Money (ATM) options as if I did that a large portion of my purchase would have been time value. I don't know what VIX was at this particular time but it isn't  important to this post. Even if VIX was at a an all time low and I was essentially paying very little time premium, this was still a case where had I been a better educated investor/trader, I would have been using futures. As you can see from the entry and exit dates, I was looking for very quick strikes. This wasn't meant to be a long-term trade or investment, I was just trying to profit from each 100 points move in the Dow.

Now instead of paying $12.60 for $10.00 worth of intrinsic value, I should have just used options and shorted the YM, or ES if you trade the SPY. This is just another case of me being lucky on direction and cashing out thinking I knew what I was doing. Its real easy to look at your record and think you must be doing something right, that's not always the case. And for me, it wasn't until a few years later that I truly learned how to use futures that the light went off. I clearly remember thinking to myself, "why the hell did you used to buy ITM premium instead of just shorting futures." The honest answer is just that I didn't know any better. While you can make the argument that buying an ITM put carries a defined risk while shorting futures carries unlimited risk, what I didn't mention was that had I been wrong and this moved against me I would have been quick to take my losses and move on. I had no intention of letting it ride and hoping I didn't lose 100% of an ITM purchase. So knowing what I know now, I would have shorted the futures and used a stop order at whatever point I deemed necessary.

If anyone reading finds themselves in that category of crossing over from options to futures and have any questions feel free to comment below and I promise to respond.




And 1 favor that we ask: 

If you like the hard work we put into our blog posts and videos, PLEASE help us out by sharing them. Click the share links below and share them on FB, twitter, etc. It really helps us get more exposure and grow IN THE MONEY TRADES!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WOW! I think that sums it up

Many of you have been reading this blog may have noticed that my blogging frequency has increased over the past few weeks as I got short the market. As you can imagine I am down money since getting short the market, this is the time when most people pull away from posting. But my goal is to stay active and involved and show you that trading is not always rainbows and butterflies. It is times like these that the things I have been sharing over the past couple of weeks are so important. You need to trade small relative to your account. I have a decent short position in the market and my portfolios are set up to make some awesome returns if we finally turn lower. But something I would like to point out is that my account is 70% Cash.  I learned a long time ago how important it is to live by the rules you preach. Because of my discipline I am able to continue to hold my positions, I have time and capital on my side. I can't stress enough how important it is not to get to big....

Stay Small, Stay Out of Trouble

To expand on my post from yesterday about patience. I want to talk about a very important element that allows patience in a position, and that is staying small. If you trade too big RELATIVE to your personal account size, you are likely to be forced to exit the trade before the trade works in your favor. Many trades myself included have all experienced the pains of trading a position way too large given our account size. There is this predisposition out there that the only way you are going to make money in the financial markets is if you are trading 10 lots of options and 1000 shares of stock at the time. This is not the case, and if this is your mentality you will likely ensure yourself trouble. We have all read the stories of traders blowing up their account. I personally think a good rule of thumb is to not risk more than 5% of your account value on any one position. Good Luck Trading! In The Money Trades And 1 favor that we ask:  If you like the hard work w...
more good news from FXStreet : Tom Fitzpatrick, senior technical analyst at Citibank in New York. Monday, July 15, 2002 "Parity is a psychological, not a technical level...and whether we pause around parity or not, we are likely to see significant further dollar losses...Our initial target is $1.03 to $1.0450. If that level is taken out, it actually casts a question mark against the whole of the dollar's rally of the last seven years, and could open up a full-blown bear market for the dollar." Julian Jessop, chief European economist at Standard Chartered Bank. Monday, July 15, 2002 "The dollar is under pressure from everything from economic problems to asset reallocation away from the U.S. and corporate accounting problems. It's difficult to see any positive factor for the dollar at the moment. The root of the problem is the U.S. current account deficit. If the U.S. doesn't have to attract an enormous amount of foreign capital, people wouldn't have to wor...